Editing GTO muscle car myth
(
diff
)
← Older revision
|
Latest revision
(
diff
) |
Newer revision →
(
diff
)
Jump to:
navigation
,
search
Recently I read an article by an auto magazine writer, who was writing about the Chrysler 300 "letter series" of muscle cars. He imparted many interesting thing about those cars. He then said the weren't muscle car because they were loaded luxury cars, he determined that a true "muscle car" had to be more affordable to more people. Lets give him and similar thinkers that. So do any of those similar thinkers or those, who on general "say so" of supposed auto affectionatos,believe their claim that the "muscle car" never existed until Pontiac invented the GTO, have an answer for the 1955 and on, PLYMOUTH-FURY, DODGE D-500 and DESOTO-ADVENTURER? These were all were called Super Sports way before Chevrolet eventually, smartly and to good advantage, copyrighted that moniker for there own line of muscle cars. Matter of fact I always felt the SS's even predated the GTO's. Someone please give us some research on this. '''The main item ''' to define the beginning of the 'muscle car' was the breaking of the number of cubic inchs per pounds rule the big 3 had. The Tempest received the larger engine and became the GTO. I believe the rule was 1 cubic inch per ten pounds. The GTO did not weigh 3800 pounds with the 389 engine... or maybe this rule I speak of is a myth?
|
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Personal tools
Log in / create account
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
Actions
Search
Navigation
Main Page
Recent changes
Random page
Help
All articles
Start a new article
Hotrodders forum
Categories
Best articles
Body and exterior
Brakes
Cooling
Electrical
Engine
Fasteners
Frame
Garage and shop
General hotrodding
Identification and decoding
Interior
Rearend
Safety
Steering
Suspension
Tires
Tools
Transmission
Troubleshooting
Wheels
Toolbox
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Terms of Use
Copyright
Privacy Policy
Your Privacy Choices
Manage Consent