User:Cobalt327
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:::Yes, that's correct, make it a category like "Engine" or "Transmission". Agreed on avoiding a huge unwieldy page. One strategy is to do a "Master Article" that links out to the sub-articles. For example, check out [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy the Wikipedia article on "Energy"]. Many of the article sections have headers like: "Main article: Conservation of Energy", etc., that lead the reader to other full articles.--[[User:Jon|Jon]] 14:33, 8 February 2012 (MST) | :::Yes, that's correct, make it a category like "Engine" or "Transmission". Agreed on avoiding a huge unwieldy page. One strategy is to do a "Master Article" that links out to the sub-articles. For example, check out [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy the Wikipedia article on "Energy"]. Many of the article sections have headers like: "Main article: Conservation of Energy", etc., that lead the reader to other full articles.--[[User:Jon|Jon]] 14:33, 8 February 2012 (MST) | ||
− | + | Jon, pls. see [http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/wiki/Talk:Transmission_holding_fixtures Discussion] when you get a minute. I do not care about "being right", I'd rather keep this from turning unnecessarily adversarial. For the better good of the Crankshaft Coalition Wiki project I will defer to whatever you decide. Not looking for drama- just accuracy.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 18:59, 9 February 2012 (MST) | |
[[File:WAGON_80_001.jpg|thumb|left|200px|'''1980 MALIBU''']] | [[File:WAGON_80_001.jpg|thumb|left|200px|'''1980 MALIBU''']] |