User:Cobalt327

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 10: Line 10:
 
:::Yes, that's correct, make it a category like "Engine" or "Transmission". Agreed on avoiding a huge unwieldy page. One strategy is to do a "Master Article" that links out to the sub-articles. For example, check out [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy the Wikipedia article on "Energy"]. Many of the article sections have headers like: "Main article: Conservation of Energy", etc., that lead the reader to other full articles.--[[User:Jon|Jon]] 14:33, 8 February 2012 (MST)
 
:::Yes, that's correct, make it a category like "Engine" or "Transmission". Agreed on avoiding a huge unwieldy page. One strategy is to do a "Master Article" that links out to the sub-articles. For example, check out [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy the Wikipedia article on "Energy"]. Many of the article sections have headers like: "Main article: Conservation of Energy", etc., that lead the reader to other full articles.--[[User:Jon|Jon]] 14:33, 8 February 2012 (MST)
  
 
+
Jon, pls. see [http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/wiki/Talk:Transmission_holding_fixtures Discussion] when you get a minute. I do not care about "being right", I'd rather keep this from turning unnecessarily adversarial. For the better good of the Crankshaft Coalition Wiki project I will defer to whatever you decide. Not looking for drama- just accuracy.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 18:59, 9 February 2012 (MST)
  
  
  
 
[[File:WAGON_80_001.jpg|thumb|left|200px|'''1980 MALIBU''']]
 
[[File:WAGON_80_001.jpg|thumb|left|200px|'''1980 MALIBU''']]

Revision as of 20:59, 9 February 2012

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Categories
Toolbox