User talk:LT1Silverhawk
From Crankshaft Coalition Wiki
m (→Sub subcategory- Quadrajet carbs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Forming subcategories== | ||
Jon, or anyone else who knows how: what is the procedure, if any, for making sub-categories. | Jon, or anyone else who knows how: what is the procedure, if any, for making sub-categories. | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
::Thank you Jon. That clears everything up. --[[User:LT1Silverhawk|LT1Silverhawk]] 15:03, 15 February 2012 (MST) | ::Thank you Jon. That clears everything up. --[[User:LT1Silverhawk|LT1Silverhawk]] 15:03, 15 February 2012 (MST) | ||
==Sub subcategory- Quadrajet carbs== | ==Sub subcategory- Quadrajet carbs== | ||
| − | + | At least for now I've removed the sub subcategory ''Quadrajet carburetors'' from the subcategory ''Carburetors''. The reason was, I didn't even see it after going back into the Carburetors subcategory "cold", so my thoughts are no one else is likely to see it if I didn't. | |
Let me '''''stress''''' that I have absolutely '''no problem''' if you'd like to change it back, or to a different format altogether.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 19:51, 3 April 2012 (MDT) | Let me '''''stress''''' that I have absolutely '''no problem''' if you'd like to change it back, or to a different format altogether.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 19:51, 3 April 2012 (MDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I know what you mean and I agree with your decision to do that. I remember following the bread crumbs a while back and, unless you knew it existed, you woudln't know to look for it. My opinion is that, at least for now, it is probably a good idea to keep all articles just under ''"Carburetors"'' category. As more more articles are added, then we can focus on sub-categories if needed.--[[User:LT1Silverhawk|LT1Silverhawk]] 22:14, 3 April 2012 (MDT) | ||
Your Privacy Choices