Streetbeasts fraud controversy
(→Forum discussions) |
(→Denial of fraud conviction) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
Referencing [http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2006-03-02/news/a-beastly-background an article in the Miami New Times exposing StreetBeasts], in [http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/streetbeast-rod-kits-13109-29.html#post1006382 this post], a StreetBeasts representative said: "What this article doesn't say is that anyone in particular was found guilty". | Referencing [http://www.miaminewtimes.com/2006-03-02/news/a-beastly-background an article in the Miami New Times exposing StreetBeasts], in [http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/streetbeast-rod-kits-13109-29.html#post1006382 this post], a StreetBeasts representative said: "What this article doesn't say is that anyone in particular was found guilty". | ||
| − | In [http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/streetbeast-rod-kits-13109-42.html#post1012355 this post], a StreetBeasts representative said: "after the investigation they concluded that no economic fraud was committed so no indictment was made". | + | In [http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/streetbeast-rod-kits-13109-42.html#post1012355 this post on the Hotrodders Bulletin Board], a StreetBeasts representative said: "after the investigation they concluded that no economic fraud was committed so no indictment was made". |
====Fudging the connection between StreetBeasts and Classic Motor Carriages==== | ====Fudging the connection between StreetBeasts and Classic Motor Carriages==== | ||
Your Privacy Choices