User talk:Cobalt327

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
:::Yes. This is a great way to encourage user engagement on the wiki.--[[User:Jon|Jon]] 09:33, 13 February 2012 (MST)
 
:::Yes. This is a great way to encourage user engagement on the wiki.--[[User:Jon|Jon]] 09:33, 13 February 2012 (MST)
 
::::Great. I thought I understood but was wanting to make sure should this come up again.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 10:14, 13 February 2012 (MST)
 
::::Great. I thought I understood but was wanting to make sure should this come up again.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 10:14, 13 February 2012 (MST)
 +
 +
==Consolidating similar subject within a category==
 +
 +
Camshaft article
 +
 +
There's already a couple pages pertaining to some part of camshafts ([[Cam and compression ratio compatibility]] and [[Camshaft install tips and tricks]]) under the 'Engine' category.
 +
 +
I want to do an article with an overview of how the camshaft works, along info on the different types of cams and why they came to be, etc.
 +
 +
My question is, should this be a new category like what was done with 'Quadrajet carburetor', or should it be a page in 'Engine' like the two pages I mentioned above? My concern is creating too many categories.
 +
 +
Or is there a way to use a bulleted list in the different categories, i.e.:
 +
 +
(Engine category, under "C")
 +
*Camshaft page (containing the info I mentioned above like 'How the cam works', 'Types of cams', etc.)
 +
**Cam and compression ratio compatibility page
 +
**Camshaft install tips and tricks page
 +
**Et cetera?
 +
 +
There are other instances where this could put pages on a similar subject together under a heading- like the RPO codes we talked about earlier:
 +
 +
*RPO codes (containing an overview, etc.)
 +
**GM RPO build codes
 +
**General Motors build codes
 +
**More GM RPO codes
 +
--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 16:26, 17 February 2012 (MST)

Revision as of 18:26, 17 February 2012

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Categories
Toolbox