|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Note1}}{{Sign2}}
| |
| − | ==Condensing RPO articles==
| |
| − | There are three different Wiki articles on RPO/Build Codes:
| |
| | | | |
| − | http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/wiki/GM_Build_Codes
| |
| − | http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/wiki/General_Motors_build_codes
| |
| − | http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/wiki/More_GM_RPO_codes
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | They could be condensed into one main article, then broken up into whatever segments that would work best.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Like separate the main article by:
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Engine
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Drive Train (or Transmission and Differential)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Interior
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Exterior
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Et Cetera, so the main article will be smaller than it will be if they're all combined. I'm relatively sure there are many duplications between all three pages.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I have another segment that's HUGE, that may fairly cover them all, but I haven't added it or posted it as another separate Wiki article because of its size.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Any thoughts on any of this?--[[User:cobalt327|cobalt327]] 16:45, January 27, 2012 (MST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :Agreed.--[[User:Jon|Jon]] 15:10, 27 January 2012 (MST)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ::More importantly, the actual model(s) / year(s) covered by this list should be posted at the top. It's common knowledge that there is no single RPO list (just too much good sense to do it that way! LOL). I know this doesn't cover my 2004 Cadillac Deville. Yes, some line up and some make so sense at all. Just sayin.. [[Special:Contributions/24.94.62.130|24.94.62.130]] 12:48, 2 May 2015 (MDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | :::Sounds like a good idea. That's the beauty of the wiki- a good idea such as this can be implemented... by YOU!! So feel free to take a swing at it. If you want or need any assistance, give me a shout and maybe I can lend a hand.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 13:30, 2 May 2015 (MDT)
| |
Your Privacy Choices