Soda blasting

Jump to: navigation, search
(Reasons against using soda blasting)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
==Reasons in favor of using soda blasting==
 
==Reasons in favor of using soda blasting==
 
*Environmental friendliness.
 
*Environmental friendliness.
*Non-destructive.
+
*Non-destructive, and won't warp panels.
 
*For a professional, experienced shop that's well-trained in its use, does all of the finish prep work itself, and has a soda-friendly guarantee from its paint supplier, soda blasting may be a viable choice.
 
*For a professional, experienced shop that's well-trained in its use, does all of the finish prep work itself, and has a soda-friendly guarantee from its paint supplier, soda blasting may be a viable choice.
 +
*Doesn't harm glass, chrome, or rubber.
  
 
==Reasons against using soda blasting==
 
==Reasons against using soda blasting==
*Difficulty of residue removal, especially on parts with cracks/crevices, such as door jambs, engine bays, trunks.
+
*Difficulty of residue removal, especially on parts with cracks/crevices, such as door jambs, engine bays, trunks. Residue can also hide in and behind fasteners.
 
*Laborious, time-consuming steps required to prep parts after blasting.
 
*Laborious, time-consuming steps required to prep parts after blasting.
*Does not remove rust or plastic body filler.
+
*Only removes light flash rust.
 +
*Will not remove thick coatings of body filler.
 
*Does not leave an anchor pattern.
 
*Does not leave an anchor pattern.
 
*Voids warranties with many paint manufacturers.
 
*Voids warranties with many paint manufacturers.
 
*Overall, probably not the best choice for the hobbyist or do-it-yourselfer.
 
*Overall, probably not the best choice for the hobbyist or do-it-yourselfer.
 +
*Can't re-use the medium after blasting.
  
 
==Published professional opinions on soda blasting==
 
==Published professional opinions on soda blasting==

Revision as of 15:11, 9 August 2009

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Categories
Toolbox