Hotrodders.com engine forum thread quality
(→Examples of potentially low-quality or too-basic threads) |
m |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
*Less-savvy hotrodders who read the latest mags and evangelize the vendor-sponsored articles (AKA: "product leg humpers" or "catalog jockies"). | *Less-savvy hotrodders who read the latest mags and evangelize the vendor-sponsored articles (AKA: "product leg humpers" or "catalog jockies"). | ||
| − | + | ==Examples of potentially low-quality or too-basic threads== | |
| − | + | *"How much HP..." | |
| − | + | *My brand rules, your brand sucks." | |
| − | + | *"I haven't done a basic tuneup, but here's my problem..." | |
| − | + | *"My engine is making a funny noise, and I don't know where to start." | |
| − | + | *"Should my carb be 600 CFM, or 650 CFM?" | |
| − | + | *"Is brand A camshaft better than brand B?" | |
| − | + | *"Can someone desktop dyno this combo for me?" | |
| − | + | *"Do these heads make 'great' power?" | |
| − | + | *"Anyone ever heard of [insert commonly known company name here]?" | |
| − | + | *"My engine doesn't run right. What's the exact problem?" | |
| − | + | *"How fast will my car go with a 350?" | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ==Use of the phrasing "beginner" and "basic"== | |
| − | + | It might be best to move away from use of the word "beginner", as it's potentially more likely to be perceived as derogatory. "Basic" is the preferred term. If there are suggestions for other wording, please add them to this section. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
==What can be adjusted now?== | ==What can be adjusted now?== | ||
Your Privacy Choices