User talk:Cobalt327
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Yes. This is a great way to encourage user engagement on the wiki.--[[User:Jon|Jon]] 09:33, 13 February 2012 (MST) | :::Yes. This is a great way to encourage user engagement on the wiki.--[[User:Jon|Jon]] 09:33, 13 February 2012 (MST) | ||
::::Great. I thought I understood but was wanting to make sure should this come up again.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 10:14, 13 February 2012 (MST) | ::::Great. I thought I understood but was wanting to make sure should this come up again.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 10:14, 13 February 2012 (MST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Consolidating similar subject within a category== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Camshaft article | ||
+ | |||
+ | There's already a couple pages pertaining to some part of camshafts ([[Cam and compression ratio compatibility]] and [[Camshaft install tips and tricks]]) under the 'Engine' category. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I want to do an article with an overview of how the camshaft works, along info on the different types of cams and why they came to be, etc. | ||
+ | |||
+ | My question is, should this be a new category like what was done with 'Quadrajet carburetor', or should it be a page in 'Engine' like the two pages I mentioned above? My concern is creating too many categories. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Or is there a way to use a bulleted list in the different categories, i.e.: | ||
+ | |||
+ | (Engine category, under "C") | ||
+ | *Camshaft page (containing the info I mentioned above like 'How the cam works', 'Types of cams', etc.) | ||
+ | **Cam and compression ratio compatibility page | ||
+ | **Camshaft install tips and tricks page | ||
+ | **Et cetera? | ||
+ | |||
+ | There are other instances where this could put pages on a similar subject together under a heading- like the RPO codes we talked about earlier: | ||
+ | |||
+ | *RPO codes (containing an overview, etc.) | ||
+ | **GM RPO build codes | ||
+ | **General Motors build codes | ||
+ | **More GM RPO codes | ||
+ | --[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 16:26, 17 February 2012 (MST) |