Talk:Http:www.myfifa.com

~Do you have similar feelings about the auction house? Hedlund: I think it was detrimental to the effects of playing all the time. She did not want to book some sort of spoils the auction house, and therefore did not fall in a game with such frequency that people were looking for. At the same time, I get ... I do not think it's a matter of being greedy. Game developers, and we are working hard, and want to be rewarded for what we do. The fact that World of Warcraft was still on the shelves and natures who played in Korea, especially after 10 years of that was releasing something I think blizzard was like ... 'Hey, we a table of prices is not very different from the '. This does not respect the amount of game that people clearly it was [http://www.mmotank.com cheap wow gold]  going. So I can certainly see that point of view, which says, 'Hey, we should be rewarded for what the public has given us', then think of ways to do it. This is the world we live in, too, especially in the free to play games. You have to think about how ... we are still a business. We have to make money. But we must do it in a natural way and not feel sorry screwed and forced the player, but in reality it makes sense for them. Value proposition should be there. Stig Hedlund, former lead designer of World of Warcraft. The blizzard to solve the problem that existed in the World of Warcraft. People are going to sell items. So why not do at home? Hedlund: It certainly makes sense at this level. They offer something for players and try to get the value of the company. It's just that the actual way it has done is not reached perfection. Is there anything you could have done differently in the creation of the World of Warcraft if you are involved in this project? Hedlund: I think one of the things that seemed really was ... things at a low level. Dungeon was not enough for me to chance. They feel little has been done, is not that very quickly. I think the way people play in multi-player games that pretty much just run out and try to figure out the fastest way to get there, instead of starting with a minute to a minute exploration of the world. What World of Warcraft taught him about the game design? Hedlund: The big difference between World of Warcraft was the character customization. This is something I've embraced for ChronoBlade. It fit perfectly with our vision of how the two halves of moment to moment and PgR- fit. There are very strong skill trees that allow you to customize the game to all characters in the way you want to deal with it. We have passive skills, which we call the function, and active skills, which we call capabilities. You can decide, 'Hey, I just want to play back tracking fed a fighting game. I do not want to use their skills. I want to use a function to. I'll do as much damage as you can with the core gameplay '. Or you can say, 'Hey, I want to do all these capabilities and calm things down.' Or a combination of the two. There are different subjects and in all those things.

~Do you have similar feelings about the auction house? Hedlund: I think it was detrimental to the effects of playing all the time. She did not want to book some sort of spoils the auction house, and therefore did not fall in a game with such frequency that people were looking for. At the same time, I get ... I do not think it's a matter of being greedy. Game developers, and we are working hard, and want to be rewarded for what we do. The fact that World of Warcraft was still on the shelves and natures who played in Korea, especially after 10 years of that was releasing something I think blizzard was like ... 'Hey, we a table of prices is not very different from the '. This does not respect the amount of game that people clearly it was [http://www.mmotank.com cheap wow gold]  going. So I can certainly see that point of view, which says, 'Hey, we should be rewarded for what the public has given us', then think of ways to do it. This is the world we live in, too, especially in the free to play games. You have to think about how ... we are still a business. We have to make money. But we must do it in a natural way and not feel sorry screwed and forced the player, but in reality it makes sense for them. Value proposition should be there. Stig Hedlund, former lead designer of World of Warcraft. The blizzard to solve the problem that existed in the World of Warcraft. People are going to sell items. So why not do at home? Hedlund: It certainly makes sense at this level. They offer something for players and try to get the value of the company. It's just that the actual way it has done is not reached perfection. Is there anything you could have done differently in the creation of the World of Warcraft if you are involved in this project? Hedlund: I think one of the things that seemed really was ... things at a low level. Dungeon was not enough for me to chance. They feel little has been done, is not that very quickly. I think the way people play in multi-player games that pretty much just run out and try to figure out the fastest way to get there, instead of starting with a minute to a minute exploration of the world. What World of Warcraft taught him about the game design? Hedlund: The big difference between World of Warcraft was the character customization. This is something I've embraced for ChronoBlade. It fit perfectly with our vision of how the two halves of moment to moment and PgR- fit. There are very strong skill trees that allow you to customize the game to all characters in the way you want to deal with it. We have passive skills, which we call the function, and active skills, which we call capabilities. You can decide, 'Hey, I just want to play back tracking fed a fighting game. I do not want to use their skills. I want to use a function to. I'll do as much damage as you can with the core gameplay '. Or you can say, 'Hey, I want to do all these capabilities and calm things down.' Or a combination of the two. There are different subjects and in all those things.